I found this article via Reddit:
[Back to Black]
(if NYT has decided you need to register, just use username cyberpunk: password: cyberpunk)
I know I don’t have a real stake in this, being a Scandinavian white girl, but it has always bugged me, this term. If I can be called “white” when I am clearly more of a pink-ish beige hue; why can’t people with darker skin be called black? Or brown? or whatever. It’s not putting anyone in a box. I see it simply as being a descriptor, like I am a blonde (and yes, I know that may come with some stigma as well). Heck why not African (if they are from Africa), or Jamacian, or Indian, or Haitian. But then I suppose you’d have to call me ‘English, Dutch, Scottish, Welsh, Russian,Norweigian’ and that can be a little time consuming.
I worked with a woman who couldn’t be more white-looking (pale skin, red hair) and speaks with a British accent, but she’s from South Africa, living here so she is an African-American, right?
I also knew someone in college who was very dark skinned and from Jamaica. He hated being called African-American. No one in his entire family had ever even set foot in Africa. Unless, you want to go with the theory that we ALL came from Africa, if you look far enough back. but they we’re all African American.And if a person from Africa moves to China are they called an African-Chinese?
Discuss…
Posted under Random Thoughts
This post was written by Amy on February 28, 2008